@ThatSteroidGuy it IS very important when it comes to brewing thousands of vials at a time. I’ve been close a lot with common substances like test p 200
I had 201.1mg/mL of 200 but that was with test p and I purposely OD’d it a little. I always use graduated cylinders too because they’re the most accurate. Now. Back on topic, as
@BigDaddyV5150 mentioned, it’s hard to find uncommon displacements for atypical brews such as Superdrol.
@purplepandalabs told me specifically how to do it when I was trying to find it for another one. And if
@purplepandalabs could enlighten us with his knowledge yet again, I would be extremely grateful.
However, I do believe, that dividing the number 1
by the density of the substance works too. But am I wrong?
It is important when doing big brews because powder displaces liquid. Now you can say that, “well I’d you’re going to do 4L of Superdrol, why don’t you just fill the last liquid to the “4 Liter line” , Regardless. Beakers deviate in accuracy + or - 5% whereas a graduated cylinders deviate by 1% in accuracy which makes life a lot easier knowing I’m close to dosage. However, the powder you place in the beaker is a physical
Item that displaces fluid like when one enters a
Hot tub and the water rises. So for instance, a gram of test e displaces .943mL of fluid when mixed. So
in essence, a kilogram of test e takes up 943 mL of space in. 4 Liter beaker. That affects the amount of BB, BA, and the carrier oil going into the mix. You wouldn’t just fill 4L of your fluid then add the kilo of test e. You’d be way underdosed.
Now! Sorry for the boring part but for those who didn’t understand what is going on, well I may have made it worse. @Colonial-Labs I’m not sure if that was dis to me on being a brewer and to know this is very important, because it is and I’ve had testing done over the past 1 year plus with another source and my results have been great. I just want to know
@purplepandalabs method again because it bugged me so much trying to figure it out. But I forgot about the density and diving 1 by it gives the corre t answer; I’ve gotten tested with this way of calculating displacement and I was accurate. Anywaysssssa I’m done