PharmaHGH Primo E

[Luxferro]

So, a while ago I tested some of PharmaHGH’s Primo E with a roid test kit. The results seemed to suggest it wasn’t primo. I sent a sample to Jano and it checked out. Actual Primo E.

PharmaHGH was very understanding despite me bashing his product based off a test kit.

Lesson learned; roid test kits are unreliable.

PharmaHGH offered to give me a replacement vial as well since the dose was a bit low. AFAIK this can happen to anyone due to variance in the purity of the raws from batch to batch.

Anyways, wanted to publicly apologize to @Pharmahgh

 

[FrancoC]

183mg/ml for what I’m assuming is listed as 200mg/ml? Is that standard variance or a bit on the under dosed side?

 

[Liska]

AFAIK this can happen to anyone due to variance in the purity of the raws from batch to batch.

There is no significant variance in the purity of Primobolan raws. The worst Primobolan raw purity you should see is 96%+ with the majority being 98%+. Anything less than that would be the result of degradation from (improper) long term storage and/or purchasing from a source that should not be in this business. It's not for me to take a stab at why several SST sources have uniquely had Primo 200mg test in the low 180mg range this year but it should perk some fox ears.

 

[T&H]

There is no significant variance in the purity of Primobolan raws. The worst Primobolan raw purity you should see is 96%+ with the majority being 98%+. Anything less than that would be the result of degradation from (improper) long term storage and/or purchasing from a source that should not be in this business. It's not for me to take a stab at why several SST sources have uniquely had Primo 200mg test in the low 180mg range this year but it should perk some fox ears.

In your opinion, is it more along the lines of brewing less raws to save money?

 

[Liska]

In your opinion, is it more along the lines of brewing less raws to save money?

With Primo raws costing about 8k/kg (and price not being correlated with purity), purposely underdosing 200mg/ml by 10% would save about $2 per vial, making this an incredibly unfavourable idea in terms of risk/reward given that Primo 200mg gets blindtested commonly and how much a good or bad test result can affect sales in either direction. My personal opinion is that this is simply a result of incorrect measuring during brewing followed by a lack of testing finished products before selling them. No brewer is perfect but by properly testing, a finished product can still be adjusted and retested before (or even after, though that's substantially more annoying) it's filled into vials.