What's new
Steroid Source Talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts.

  • Please reset your passwords! We have upgraded our forum software and accounts may require a password reset, please use the following link: https://steroidsourcetalk.cc/index.php?lost-password/

Viper Flex Mast-E 250 mg/ml Blind Testing

viper-flex

Active member
Unverified Source
LV
0
 
Blind test results from Jano on @viper-flex Mast-E 250.
Thank you for taking the time to send out the testing. We will honor the 120 store credit. The test reflects 11% under and we're making the proper adjustments to improve the next batch. We followed the proper procedures to create the right dosage so with this feed back we are sending the raws out for testing to check its purity.
Thank you for your transparency and sharing with the community. We are humble and always seeking to improve and serve the community the best we can.
Best regards - VF
 

Liska

Active member
LV
0
 
Got damn that is off! @viper-flex clearly you don't do raw testing or you would've known that you were using shit quality raws. Care to explain why this is so off?
Finding Mast E/P raws below 96% would be impressively shit, even finding them below 98%+ would be memorable so this is doubtful but not impossible.

The test reflects 11% under and we're making the proper adjustments to improve the next batch.
Did you reuse your recipe based on a good test result from a previous batch of 250mg Mast E? If so, I'll explain what happened.
 

Therainmaker

New member
LV
0
 
Finding Mast E/P raws below 96% would be impressively shit, even finding them below 98%+ would be memorable so this is doubtful but not impossible.


Did you reuse your recipe based on a good test result from a previous batch of 250mg Mast E? If so, I'll explain what happened.
I don't need you to explain what happened. I need for him to even though I have and idea what happened. He more then likely didn't test his raw product before and and just brewed the Mast. If he would've test them before hand he would've known they were not the quality his supplier told him they are and could've brewed them accordingly so his Mast wouldn't have been so under dosed. Now this makes me think ALL of his other oils and orals might be under dosed.
 

Liska

Active member
LV
0
 
I don't need you to explain what happened. I need for him to even though I have and idea what happened. He more then likely didn't test his raw product before and and just brewed the Mast. If he would've test them before hand he would've known they were not the quality his supplier told him they are and could've brewed them accordingly so his Mast wouldn't have been so under dosed. Now this makes me think ALL of his other oils and orals might be under dosed.
While I agree that not testing every batch of raws and finished product is irresponsible, please sit back and listen patiently. There's a variable of cyclical nature you have zero idea about (and very few UGL do) that is not correlated to the purity of raws.
 

Therainmaker

New member
LV
0
 
Even though it is underdosed .. it is 11% , I say 10% error is okay ; it happens
You're right 10% is fine, but 11% is not! It also raises something that could be a bigger problem. Whoever is brewing there gear might not know how to brew correctly and or they don't test there raws powder before they brew so they know how to dose the gear correctly. When I'm spending my money good enough doesn't cut it for me. At my job or my business if I went with the mindset "it's good enough" I wouldn't have a job or a business for very long.
 

gains3000

Member
LV
0
 
before i even opened the result i knew it was underodsed. all these sources are underdosing their gear. its bullshit. which source is going to step up and start overdosing their injectables?
 

Therainmaker

New member
LV
0
 
before i even opened the result i knew it was underodsed. all these sources are underdosing their gear. its bullshit. which source is going to step up and start overdosing their injectables?
That's not ture for all sources. GoodLyfe does a very good job of testing his raws and oils and they are from what I've seen always within the 10% variance that is acceptable. Now any source can have a bad brew. When that happens I need to know what they are going to do to correct this action and keep it from happening in the future. Also if they intend to sale the underdosed gear let people know what dose it truly is and sale it at a discounted price. They would still make a lot of money. These sources kill me! It isn't rocket science, it's simple business.

 
Top