I stopped following this thread as I have been busy recently, but I am honestly surpised to see that you would respond to my relatively reasonable review with lies about your communication.
Let me address the points brought up.
There's a difference between pure speculation and an informed reasonable assumption. If you see an elephant an say, "there's no way that weighs less than a ton", it would be out of place for anyone to say that it was pure speculation. Once you have developed a frame of reference for the relationship between volume and mass, you can absolutely make a reasonable estimation of weight, or disqualifiy an obviously misrepresented mass. In addition, as referenced in the email communication (which you absolutely did stop responding to, no idea why you would claim that when email has a trail) there were large visual differences between the volume of peptide between the vials. This doesn't necessarily indicate a discrepency in mass (packing density can vary, especially after a lyophilization process), but it is much more likely to occur with a higher mass of powder. In addition, the color was clearly off from what actual pure GHK-Cu should look like.
I'll let other members be the judge as to whether the contents of the GHK-Cu vials look to be 10mg of power with the pictures attached, which are the same pictures I sent you when I initially reached out concerning my order, which was ignored. Before anyone comments "weighing the vials won't provide an accurate comparison of the powder contained within", I'm well aware and stated as such in the email, but ViperFlex had requested that I send him pictures of the vials weighed. Assuming decent quality control with the vials, however, and the fact that the visually larger puck is reading a larger weight by 11mg (more than the proported total weight of the powder within the vial), I believe it indicates something.
This is just a blantant lie and honestly kind of funny. I actually did send you a video of me rotating the caps, unprompted, after my first email indicating concern over the filler. Like the prior email, you also failed to respond to this one. In the attachements below are my final two email communications with you, as well as the inbox showing that you failed to respond to either one. The fact that you responded in this way indicates to me that you absolutely saw the video, and chose to ignore it and then respond in this thread with lies about the situation. Why? I have no idea. What could have been an honest mistake now just seems overtly malicious.
Here is the video of the loose caps, if anyone is curious.
Securely store, share, and access your important files and photos. Anytime, anywhere.
drive.proton.me
