GHRP-6

[Webiseb]

Anyone run this peptide? If so, does it have any advantages over gh?

 

[strongfat619]

I dunno man but GHRP-2 makes me go hypo in like 15 seconds, then I have to slay an entire pantry of food. They said GHRP-6 is even more intense w/ gastric motility but maybe I’m just a super high responder.

IMHO stay READY with some food

 

[PissedPajamas]

Ipamorelin produces a smaller GH spike than GHRP-6 but without some of the nasty effects GHRP-6 has. Haven’t personally tried it but I’ve got a vial + CJC-1295 w/ no DAC waiting for me at home. Seems like the golden combo from what I’ve read

 

[Webiseb]

PissedPajamas" pid='21719' dateline='1533056756:

Ipamorelin produces a smaller GH spike than GHRP-6 but without some of the nasty effects GHRP-6 has. Haven’t personally tried it but I’ve got a vial + CJC-1295 w/ no DAC waiting for me at home. Seems like the golden combo from what I’ve read

GHRP-2 combined with Mod GRF 1-29 seems to be effective for guys, but how much more effective can they be than legit gh? I get the whole “gh shuts your natty levels down” but it’s not like my natty test production is firing now due to pinning test etc

 

[PissedPajamas]

Webiseb" pid='21740' dateline='1533066571:

PissedPajamas" pid='21719' dateline='1533056756:

Ipamorelin produces a smaller GH spike than GHRP-6 but without some of the nasty effects GHRP-6 has. Haven’t personally tried it but I’ve got a vial + CJC-1295 w/ no DAC waiting for me at home. Seems like the golden combo from what I’ve read

GHRP-2 combined with Mod GRF 1-29 seems to be effective for guys, but how much more effective can they be than legit gh? I get the whole “gh shuts your natty levels down” but it’s not like my natty test production is firing now due to pinning test etc

Bruh. GH and Test work through systems independent of each other, exogenous Testosterone does not blunt natty GH release, as a matter of fact it increases its potency in IGF-1 signaling

https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0005/ea0005p161

 

[everywhereatonce]

You want to run GHRP-6 or any other GHRP along with CJC no DAC/Mod GRF (same thing) Take them on an empty stomach or they will do nothing, and wait 20 minutes before you eat.

GHRP-6 will make you crazy hungry, use it if you’re bulking. Ipamorelin won’t, use it if you’re cutting.

Don’t expect gainz. You get a bit of fat loss, but if that’s all you want there are cheaper ways. Low dose GH and peps are for better health, better skin, better sleep, and faster recovery. The older you are the more you’ll notice.

 

[Bitters34]

PissedPajamas" pid='21749' dateline='1533078074:

Webiseb" pid='21740' dateline='1533066571:

PissedPajamas" pid='21719' dateline='1533056756:

Ipamorelin produces a smaller GH spike than GHRP-6 but without some of the nasty effects GHRP-6 has. Haven’t personally tried it but I’ve got a vial + CJC-1295 w/ no DAC waiting for me at home. Seems like the golden combo from what I’ve read

GHRP-2 combined with Mod GRF 1-29 seems to be effective for guys, but how much more effective can they be than legit gh? I get the whole “gh shuts your natty levels down” but it’s not like my natty test production is firing now due to pinning test etc

Bruh. GH and Test work through systems independent of each other, exogenous Testosterone does not blunt natty GH release, as a matter of fact it increases its potency in IGF-1 signaling

https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0005/ea0005p161

Tits study Bruh. Nice work.

 

[Webiseb]

PissedPajamas" pid='21749' dateline='1533078074:

Webiseb" pid='21740' dateline='1533066571:

PissedPajamas" pid='21719' dateline='1533056756:

Ipamorelin produces a smaller GH spike than GHRP-6 but without some of the nasty effects GHRP-6 has. Haven’t personally tried it but I’ve got a vial + CJC-1295 w/ no DAC waiting for me at home. Seems like the golden combo from what I’ve read

GHRP-2 combined with Mod GRF 1-29 seems to be effective for guys, but how much more effective can they be than legit gh? I get the whole “gh shuts your natty levels down” but it’s not like my natty test production is firing now due to pinning test etc

Bruh. GH and Test work through systems independent of each other, exogenous Testosterone does not blunt natty GH release, as a matter of fact it increases its potency in IGF-1 signaling

https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0005/ea0005p161

I’m not suggesting that introducing gh will shut test down. My point is that by introducing test, I have already shut my natural test production down. The same will happen with gh if I introduce gh to my system. I was making a corollary, as I know the systems are different.
I’m just wondering if peptides are as effective as pharma gh. I tend to think not.

 

[PissedPajamas]

Webiseb" pid='22064' dateline='1533416540:

PissedPajamas" pid='21749' dateline='1533078074:

Webiseb" pid='21740' dateline='1533066571:

PissedPajamas" pid='21719' dateline='1533056756:

Ipamorelin produces a smaller GH spike than GHRP-6 but without some of the nasty effects GHRP-6 has. Haven’t personally tried it but I’ve got a vial + CJC-1295 w/ no DAC waiting for me at home. Seems like the golden combo from what I’ve read

GHRP-2 combined with Mod GRF 1-29 seems to be effective for guys, but how much more effective can they be than legit gh? I get the whole “gh shuts your natty levels down” but it’s not like my natty test production is firing now due to pinning test etc

Bruh. GH and Test work through systems independent of each other, exogenous Testosterone does not blunt natty GH release, as a matter of fact it increases its potency in IGF-1 signaling

https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0005/ea0005p161

I’m not suggesting that introducing gh will shut test down. My point is that by introducing test, I have already shut my natural test production down. The same will happen with gh if I introduce gh to my system. I was making a corollary, as I know the systems are different.
I’m just wondering if peptides are as effective as pharma gh. I tend to think not.

Yes, exogenous HGH with suppress natural HGH production.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC423324/

But expect a bounce back in IGF-1 after 72-96 hours (I’ve seen bloodwork and a study but can’t find it atm)

 

[Webiseb]

PissedPajamas" pid='22067' dateline='1533420829:

Webiseb" pid='22064' dateline='1533416540:

PissedPajamas" pid='21749' dateline='1533078074:

Webiseb" pid='21740' dateline='1533066571:

PissedPajamas" pid='21719' dateline='1533056756:

Ipamorelin produces a smaller GH spike than GHRP-6 but without some of the nasty effects GHRP-6 has. Haven’t personally tried it but I’ve got a vial + CJC-1295 w/ no DAC waiting for me at home. Seems like the golden combo from what I’ve read

GHRP-2 combined with Mod GRF 1-29 seems to be effective for guys, but how much more effective can they be than legit gh? I get the whole “gh shuts your natty levels down” but it’s not like my natty test production is firing now due to pinning test etc

Bruh. GH and Test work through systems independent of each other, exogenous Testosterone does not blunt natty GH release, as a matter of fact it increases its potency in IGF-1 signaling

https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0005/ea0005p161

I’m not suggesting that introducing gh will shut test down. My point is that by introducing test, I have already shut my natural test production down. The same will happen with gh if I introduce gh to my system. I was making a corollary, as I know the systems are different.
I’m just wondering if peptides are as effective as pharma gh. I tend to think not.

Yes, exogenous HGH with suppress natural HGH production.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC423324/

But expect a bounce back in IGF-1 after 72-96 hours (I’ve seen bloodwork and a study but can’t find it atm)

I guess my question is:
Will pharma gh be more effective than peptides? I’ll run with test, proviron and mast.

 

[PissedPajamas]

Webiseb" pid='22558' dateline='1533932954:

PissedPajamas" pid='22067' dateline='1533420829:

Webiseb" pid='22064' dateline='1533416540:

PissedPajamas" pid='21749' dateline='1533078074:

Webiseb" pid='21740' dateline='1533066571:

GHRP-2 combined with Mod GRF 1-29 seems to be effective for guys, but how much more effective can they be than legit gh? I get the whole “gh shuts your natty levels down” but it’s not like my natty test production is firing now due to pinning test etc

Bruh. GH and Test work through systems independent of each other, exogenous Testosterone does not blunt natty GH release, as a matter of fact it increases its potency in IGF-1 signaling

https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0005/ea0005p161

I’m not suggesting that introducing gh will shut test down. My point is that by introducing test, I have already shut my natural test production down. The same will happen with gh if I introduce gh to my system. I was making a corollary, as I know the systems are different.
I’m just wondering if peptides are as effective as pharma gh. I tend to think not.

Yes, exogenous HGH with suppress natural HGH production.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC423324/

But expect a bounce back in IGF-1 after 72-96 hours (I’ve seen bloodwork and a study but can’t find it atm)

I guess my question is:
Will pharma gh be more effective than peptides? I’ll run with test, proviron and mast.

Depends on what you want. If youre looking for health benefits of growth hormone like restorative sleep, better skin and anti-aging properties then peptides are more bang for your buck. If you want the lypolytic and anabolic properties of HGH then pharma GH will win every time but will be much more expensive.

 

[Webiseb]

PissedPajamas" pid='22565' dateline='1533939917:

Webiseb" pid='22558' dateline='1533932954:

PissedPajamas" pid='22067' dateline='1533420829:

Webiseb" pid='22064' dateline='1533416540:

PissedPajamas" pid='21749' dateline='1533078074:

Bruh. GH and Test work through systems independent of each other, exogenous Testosterone does not blunt natty GH release, as a matter of fact it increases its potency in IGF-1 signaling

https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0005/ea0005p161

I’m not suggesting that introducing gh will shut test down. My point is that by introducing test, I have already shut my natural test production down. The same will happen with gh if I introduce gh to my system. I was making a corollary, as I know the systems are different.
I’m just wondering if peptides are as effective as pharma gh. I tend to think not.

Yes, exogenous HGH with suppress natural HGH production.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC423324/

But expect a bounce back in IGF-1 after 72-96 hours (I’ve seen bloodwork and a study but can’t find it atm)

I guess my question is:
Will pharma gh be more effective than peptides? I’ll run with test, proviron and mast.

Depends on what you want. If youre looking for health benefits of growth hormone like restorative sleep, better skin and anti-aging properties then peptides are more bang for your buck. If you want the lypolytic and anabolic properties of HGH then pharma GH will win every time but will be much more expensive.

There we go! Thank you.
I’m looking for all of the above, so gh is the way then.
We hear about how geno is better than huma, which is better than sero, but from what I know, real pharma gh are all the same.