CorbinFisher
New member
Hey all.
I'm about a month from completing my first cycle. I've read about this for years, trying to be as prepared as I can, so that I didn't have to wonder or hesitate when I was finally doing it.
Yet here I am, wondering and hesitating.
Cycle has gone great. 500 mg Test for 20 weeks. Did 75 mg daily of T-bol for the first six weeks. Taking HCG as well.
No noticeable sides really. A bit of acne, but barely noticeable.
Most of what I've read states that the first time you should always PCT. So I have all my stuff ready for that. However, I've been reading more and more that PCT might not be that optimal. Somebody suggested at my age (46), I should just opt for blast and cruise.
My testosterone right before the start of the cycle was 681 ng/dl, which I'm assuming is kind of alright? At the very least, it read as "normal".
To be honest, I wasn't really concerned about PCT up until recently. Now I'm genuinely thinking it might not be the way to go. I know I at least want to do another cycle (lol...right?) so I'm really torn between both options. I feel I have this great momentum going, and don't want to take 10 steps back.
I never even considered HGH, but a friend who's doing PCT is taking HGH as a sort of ... "preventive measure". I really haven't found a lot of info on whether this is even a legit strategy.
If I went the BnC way, until I completed a second cycle, should I expect being committed to TRT for life? Is PCT something I really don't want to go through, or is it still recommended? I realize I'm asking a question there might not be a clear answer to; but I was wondering what people's thoughts were.
I'm about a month from completing my first cycle. I've read about this for years, trying to be as prepared as I can, so that I didn't have to wonder or hesitate when I was finally doing it.
Yet here I am, wondering and hesitating.
Cycle has gone great. 500 mg Test for 20 weeks. Did 75 mg daily of T-bol for the first six weeks. Taking HCG as well.
No noticeable sides really. A bit of acne, but barely noticeable.
Most of what I've read states that the first time you should always PCT. So I have all my stuff ready for that. However, I've been reading more and more that PCT might not be that optimal. Somebody suggested at my age (46), I should just opt for blast and cruise.
My testosterone right before the start of the cycle was 681 ng/dl, which I'm assuming is kind of alright? At the very least, it read as "normal".
To be honest, I wasn't really concerned about PCT up until recently. Now I'm genuinely thinking it might not be the way to go. I know I at least want to do another cycle (lol...right?) so I'm really torn between both options. I feel I have this great momentum going, and don't want to take 10 steps back.
I never even considered HGH, but a friend who's doing PCT is taking HGH as a sort of ... "preventive measure". I really haven't found a lot of info on whether this is even a legit strategy.
If I went the BnC way, until I completed a second cycle, should I expect being committed to TRT for life? Is PCT something I really don't want to go through, or is it still recommended? I realize I'm asking a question there might not be a clear answer to; but I was wondering what people's thoughts were.