What's new
Steroid Source Talk

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Guns

Wouldyalookatit

New member
With the Dylan Gemellis son/daughter/clone(Mr.Hogg) plastered all over the news, I am wondering what you all think about more gun control.

For? Against? Why or why not. I don’t think I have to tell you to keep it civil if you decide to comment.
 
Last edited:

Checkmatelabs

New member
Dylan Gemellis? Gonna have to look into this.

More gun control isn’t the answer. When has control over anything or anyone ever been the right decision?

This pretty much sums up the way I feel about the issue at hand:

“All bullets should cost $5,000” -Chris Rock
 
Last edited:

Bernie

New member
Checkmatelabs" pid='4409' dateline='1522127411:
More gun control isn’t the answer. When has control over anything or anyone ever been the right decision?
Well it works on every single country on Earth that’s actually done it… so … yeah. I’m for better fucking gun control. The second amendment was designed for militias with muskets, not for every jackass to be able to have whatever they want with no regulation, background check, or waiting period.
 
Last edited:

Checkmatelabs

New member
Bernie" pid='4415' dateline='1522131966:
Checkmatelabs" pid='4409' dateline='1522127411:
More gun control isn’t the answer. When has control over anything or anyone ever been the right decision?
Well it works on every single country on Earth that’s actually done it… so … yeah. I’m for better fucking gun control. The second amendment was designed for militias with muskets, not for every jackass to be able to have whatever they want with no regulation, background check, or waiting period.
Although arguments can be made for both sides, thats not a very fair argument.
  1. Multiple studies have shown It didn’t/doesn’t work for EVERY country on earth. Here is just one, although again, there is obvious positive outcomes that can be achieved without any weapons. https://www.dailywire.com/news/7872/7-facts-gun-crime-show-gun-control-doesnt-work-aaron-bandler
  2. Countries for example, like South Africa have very strict gun laws, yet yeild extremely high gun crime related rates year round.
  3. In many non US countries, citizens are subjected to their government taking over their homes, assaulting them or killing them. Would citizens possessing guns make a difference? I don’t know, but the second amendment is in place for this very same situation; to protect yourself/family from foreign and domestic invasions.
  4. I’m not sure where you’re buying your guns, but every single place in America, as far as I know has some sort of waiting period or background check. Apparently not long enough waiting period or strong enough background check in my opinion, but regulations none the less.
Would I feel any differently if I or my family were victim to gun violence? Probably.

But they (guns) have their place in society, like it or not. The right for a responsible contributor to society to own a firearm is no different than having a drivers license, free speech, or drink alcohol.

We do need some brilliant people to come together and do something, but those brilliant people are smart enough to understand the consequences of “Control” on the human race.

Historically, control never did anything but lead to revolutions.
 
Last edited:

Wouldyalookatit

New member
Bernie" pid='4415' dateline='1522131966:
Checkmatelabs" pid='4409' dateline='1522127411:
More gun control isn’t the answer. When has control over anything or anyone ever been the right decision?
Well it works on every single country on Earth that’s actually done it… so … yeah. I’m for better fucking gun control. The second amendment was designed for militias with muskets, not for every jackass to be able to have whatever they want with no regulation, background check, or waiting period.
And the majority of those countries are continuously seeing more and more of their rights squashed. And with your logic, look at Switzerland; 2 million people out of 8.3 million own weapons and their murder rate is near zero. All men who serve in the military there (its required) are able to purchase their SERVICE weapon to keep with them as civilians. They respect guns and are taught how to use them, as are the majority of people in the U.S. who own them legally. The countries you refer to have disarmed their people totally.

You want more gun control? How is that working out for Chicago? The strictest gun laws in the country and by far the highest amount of gun related crimes anywhere. We lost more people in Chicago than we did in Iraq/Afghanistan in 2008. The statistics are not on your side.

And finally, the Second Amendment. The founding fathers in all of their combined wisdom knew muskets would not be around forever. Heck, they had INVENTORS like Ben Franklin there thinking this stuff up. Let me share a quote or three with you.

“I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
George Mason
Co-author of the Second Amendment
during Virginia’s Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788

“To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”
Richard Henry Lee
American Statesman, 1788

"The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that … it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; … "
Thomas Jefferson
letter to Justice John Cartwright, June 5, 1824. ME 16:45.
 
Last edited:

Imissthesub

New member
Every time gun control is brought up someone mentions Chicago, and it’s the worst argument ever. Yeah, it doesn’t work in Chicago because Indiana is a short drive away and borders are just lines on a map. For gun control to be at all effect it needs to be federally implemented. Stop citing Chicago it just makes you look silly.

Guns aren’t the only problem, but they are definitely one of the problems. The War on Drugs, mental health, gun culture, laughable “rehabilitative” justice system, number of guns, our “I got mine, fuck you” society, ect. These are all contributing factors, but apparently the only solution is to arm everyone, that’ll fix it.
 
Last edited:
S

system

Guest
Guns aren’t an issue. Never have been. People are just dumb.
 

Wouldyalookatit

New member
Imissthesub" pid='4437' dateline='1522156427:
Every time gun control is brought up someone mentions Chicago, and it’s the worst argument ever. Yeah, it doesn’t work in Chicago because Indiana is a short drive away and borders are just lines on a map. For gun control to be at all effect it needs to be federally implemented. Stop citing Chicago it just makes you look silly.

Guns aren’t the only problem, but they are definitely one of the problems. The War on Drugs, mental health, gun culture, laughable “rehabilitative” justice system, number of guns, our “I got mine, fuck you” society, ect. These are all contributing factors, but apparently the only solution is to arm everyone, that’ll fix it.
The statistics are not in your favor. It has been proven time and again, that the majority of guns obtained and used in Chicago crime were gotten illegally. Criminals follow no laws. So yes, Chicago is a great example.
 
Last edited:
That kid is a hypocrite. The rebut to “school safety” was clear back packs. His rebut was (paraphrasing), that goes against our 1st amendment right (no it doesn’t idiot, it’s your 4th learn the Constitution), girls don’t want to have their tampons showing" then goes on about how it’s not fair that they have to sacrifice their right (I assume he still thinks the 1st amendment), just because one person did something to others.

That’s the hilarious irony. Yeah… there’s school shooters, doesn’t mean everyone with a gun is a potential school shooter.

If we want to prevent, “death”… then look at how many deaths by auto accidents.

Look at how many deaths by auto accidents that invovled children/teens/young adults using their cell phones while driving/operating the vehicle.

Ultimately, the left has been trying for more than a decade now to degrade the 2nd Amendment. The government has no power over our rights. These are gauranteed. Our Constitution simply educates its citizens that these are God given / naturally given rights, no human, no organization, nothing can limit them nor take them away.

Unfortunately more and more generations are too focused on stupid social status and entertainment that they could give a shit less… hence our Constitutional Rights over time has been degrading.

Prime example? For the sake of, “national security”, Bush Jr. has given us the Patriot Act and Obama has given us the NDAA. Take a close look at all the rights getting attacked by those two.

If you believe we have to sacrifice freedom/liberty for security… you don’t deserve either.

As it was once said before.
 
Last edited:

Imissthesub

New member
Wouldyalookatit" pid='4446' dateline='1522160601:
Imissthesub" pid='4437' dateline='1522156427:
Every time gun control is brought up someone mentions Chicago, and it’s the worst argument ever. Yeah, it doesn’t work in Chicago because Indiana is a short drive away and borders are just lines on a map. For gun control to be at all effect it needs to be federally implemented. Stop citing Chicago it just makes you look silly.

Guns aren’t the only problem, but they are definitely one of the problems. The War on Drugs, mental health, gun culture, laughable “rehabilitative” justice system, number of guns, our “I got mine, fuck you” society, ect. These are all contributing factors, but apparently the only solution is to arm everyone, that’ll fix it.
The statistics are not in your favor. It has been proven time and again, that the majority of guns obtained and used in Chicago crime were gotten illegally. Criminals follow no laws. So yes, Chicago is a great example.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-guns-used-in-chicago-actually-came-from/

“Only 40 percent of the guns recovered in the city were purchased in Illinois, the report read, including hundreds purchased at gun shops outside city boundaries.”

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...l-chicago-dahleen-glanton-20171003-story.html

“Law enforcement officials say 60 percent of the guns confiscated on the streets of Chicago come from Indiana, Wisconsin and Mississippi. The other 40 percent come from suburban Cook County and nearby suburbs.”

https://www.npr.org/2017/10/05/555580598/fact-check-is-chicago-proof-that-gun-laws-don-t-work

“And there’s good evidence that being next-door to those states keeps Chicago criminals well-supplied with guns. A 2015 study of guns in Chicago, co-authored by Cook, found that more than 60 percent of new guns used in Chicago gang-related crimes and 31.6 percent used in non-gang-related crimes between 2009 and 2013 were bought in other states. Indiana was a particularly heavy supplier, providing nearly one-third of the gang guns and nearly one-fifth of the non-gang guns.”



“illmortalized” pid=‘4456’ dateline=‘1522166667’ said:
If we want to prevent, “death”… then look at how many deaths by auto accidents.

Look at how many deaths by auto accidents that invovled children/teens/young adults using their cell phones while driving/operating the vehicle.

Lol wtf? You say this as if the government and auto makers haven’t been improving auto safety for decades lol. Have you seen a crash test of a recent car compared to one from the 70s? Improved crash safety, increased amount of air bags, speed limits, traffic studies, implementation of new brake technology, ect ect. There are all kinds of ways they are working to reduce auto accidents ans fatalities.

“illmortalized” pid=‘4456’ dateline=‘1522166667’ said:
Ultimately, the left has been trying for more than a decade now to degrade the 2nd Amendment. The government has no power over our rights. These are gauranteed. Our Constitution simply educates its citizens that these are God given / naturally given rights, no human, no organization, nothing can limit them nor take them away.

The government has no power over your rights? Lmao. Jesus. Ok, yes they do. For fuck’s sake you’re in a thread talking about an amendment, an amendment to the Constitution. Do you think there are no restrictions on the bill of rights? There are. Some of you need to take a political science class.
illmortalized" pid='4456' dateline='1522166667:
If you believe we have to sacrifice freedom/liberty for security… you don’t deserve either.

As it was once said before.
Super deep.
 
Last edited:

Wouldyalookatit

New member
“Imissthesub” pid=‘4474’ dateline=‘1522175782’ said:
Wouldyalookatit" pid='4446' dateline='1522160601:
Imissthesub" pid='4437' dateline='1522156427:
Every time gun control is brought up someone mentions Chicago, and it’s the worst argument ever. Yeah, it doesn’t work in Chicago because Indiana is a short drive away and borders are just lines on a map. For gun control to be at all effect it needs to be federally implemented. Stop citing Chicago it just makes you look silly.

Guns aren’t the only problem, but they are definitely one of the problems. The War on Drugs, mental health, gun culture, laughable “rehabilitative” justice system, number of guns, our “I got mine, fuck you” society, ect. These are all contributing factors, but apparently the only solution is to arm everyone, that’ll fix it.
The statistics are not in your favor. It has been proven time and again, that the majority of guns obtained and used in Chicago crime were gotten illegally. Criminals follow no laws. So yes, Chicago is a great example.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-guns-used-in-chicago-actually-came-from/

“Only 40 percent of the guns recovered in the city were purchased in Illinois, the report read, including hundreds purchased at gun shops outside city boundaries.”

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...l-chicago-dahleen-glanton-20171003-story.html

“Law enforcement officials say 60 percent of the guns confiscated on the streets of Chicago come from Indiana, Wisconsin and Mississippi. The other 40 percent come from suburban Cook County and nearby suburbs.”

https://www.npr.org/2017/10/05/555580598/fact-check-is-chicago-proof-that-gun-laws-don-t-work

“And there’s good evidence that being next-door to those states keeps Chicago criminals well-supplied with guns. A 2015 study of guns in Chicago, co-authored by Cook, found that more than 60 percent of new guns used in Chicago gang-related crimes and 31.6 percent used in non-gang-related crimes between 2009 and 2013 were bought in other states. Indiana was a particularly heavy supplier, providing nearly one-third of the gang guns and nearly one-fifth of the non-gang guns.”



“illmortalized” pid=‘4456’ dateline=‘1522166667’ said:
If we want to prevent, “death”… then look at how many deaths by auto accidents.

Look at how many deaths by auto accidents that invovled children/teens/young adults using their cell phones while driving/operating the vehicle.

Lol wtf? You say this as if the government and auto makers haven’t been improving auto safety for decades lol. Have you seen a crash test of a recent car compared to one from the 70s? Improved crash safety, increased amount of air bags, speed limits, traffic studies, implementation of new brake technology, ect ect. There are all kinds of ways they are working to reduce auto accidents ans fatalities.
illmortalized" pid='4456' dateline='1522166667:
Ultimately, the left has been trying for more than a decade now to degrade the 2nd Amendment. The government has no power over our rights. These are gauranteed. Our Constitution simply educates its citizens that these are God given / naturally given rights, no human, no organization, nothing can limit them nor take them away.

The government has no power over your rights? Lmao. Jesus. Ok, yes they do. For fuck’s sake you’re in a thread talking about an amendment, an amendment to the Constitution. Do you think there are no restrictions on the bill of rights? There are. Some of you need to take a political science class.
illmortalized" pid='4456' dateline='1522166667:
If you believe we have to sacrifice freedom/liberty for security… you don’t deserve either.

As it was once said before.
Super deep.


Not one of those links showed the guns being bought legally. It doesnt matter where they came from. Michigan has Detroit, Indiana has Gary and so on and so forth. All are dump cities polluted with crime and very easily obtained illegal weapons.
 
Last edited:

Wouldyalookatit

New member
I have another question for you @“Imissthesub”. What gun law would have prevented the mass school shootings we have seen in recent years?

The link posted above provides some good insight.
 
Last edited:

Checkmatelabs

New member
everywhereatonce" pid='4490' dateline='1522181361:
End of debate.

Everybody’s Lying About the Link Between Gun Ownership and Homicide
https://medium.com/@bjcampbell/ever...tween-gun-ownership-and-homicide-1108ed400be5
Unfortunately, when people have a biased narrative in any direction and are not in the position to be convinced, no amount of data will be useful.

How about this;

A gun can’t actually kill people, only ammunition can.

Lets blame ammunition.

However, there would be no ammunition/projectile without gun powder.

Lets blame gun powder.

However, there would be no gun powder without the Chinese.

Lets blame the Chinese.

The above argument, although seemingly ridiculous, holds just as much weight, if not more than most arguments advocating for and against gun control.

People do good things and people do bad things. Its a chaotic balance that cannot be quantified with numbers, studies or even logic.

Either get rid of ALL weapons worldwide (not just the sinister looking M4’s) or continue to let people have free will.

I personally will support both outcomes.
 
Last edited:
S

system

Guest
I know gun control advocates like to cite the UK and Australia as quality examples of gun control, but the truth is that neither of those countries would see anywhere near the level of gun violence that ours does if they had identical laws as us. The VAST majority of our gun related deaths in the US come from suicide and gang/drug violence. We like to look at Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore, etc… and their high gun related crime rate. It’s all gangs and drug dealers that are committing these crimes. Now to look at the rest of the gun related deaths, those come from accidents and “mass shootings”. I can not offer a solution to mass shootings. We can turn our school security into something like how the airports are. That would certainly improve student safety, but at what cost? At what cost do we sacrifice liberty for security? The government has been chipping away at our freedoms little by little while we sit here and take it on the chin. Now we have people all over the country BEGGING the government to take even more from them. Nah man. That’s not the answer.
 
I just want to buy guns for the wife and I and get our CCW’s. With us having a kid it’s now important to me (and she’s on board, too) for her to have something when she drives back home to see family with our kid. Will feel much better about it with her having something along the lines of a S&W Bodyguard .380 or a Beretta Nano etc. Of course I can’t make up my fucking mind on what I want. Probably an HK VP9sk or CZ TP9SF. Something along those lines.

There’s no way they will ever outlaw guns. Possibly assault rifle styles could get traction, but handguns rifles and shotguns will not be going anywhere.

I’d also like to point out that with this being a steroid forum the audience is automatically skewed towards people who are going to be pro gun unlike /r/politics or something like that.
 
Last edited:

Wouldyalookatit

New member
Good to see people actually giving arguments rather than just trying to silence the other opinion.

I strongly agree with Checkmates last post. The end of the post was excellent.
 
Last edited:
S

system

Guest
Bearslovecheese" pid='4510' dateline='1522190828:
I just want to buy guns for the wife and I and get our CCW’s. With us having a kid it’s now important to me (and she’s on board, too) for her to have something when she drives back home to see family with our kid. Will feel much better about it with her having something along the lines of a S&W Bodyguard .380 or a Beretta Nano etc. Of course I can’t make up my fucking mind on what I want. Probably an HK VP9sk or CZ TP9SF. Something along those lines.

There’s no way they will ever outlaw guns. Possibly assault rifle styles could get traction, but handguns rifles and shotguns will not be going anywhere.

I’d also like to point out that with this being a steroid forum the audience is automatically skewed towards people who are going to be pro gun unlike /r/politics or something like that.
the irony behind that is “assault rifles” AKA semiautomatic rifles that look scary are used in a very very small fraction of murders. Also check out H&K USP compact 9 mm. Super nice pistol. I’m also a big fan of Sig Sauer P226.
 

Wouldyalookatit

New member
I knew I smelled Sig fanboys here! Just kidding. Sig is a great manufacturer. As are every gun so long as it fires most of the time. Im a smith and wesson guy myself.

But hi-point sucks.
 
Last edited:
Top