Hey all-
About to post bloods for the first time but I’m a little confused with the format and I’m hoping to not fuck it up. Just got a couple questions.
-Ran 500/250 Test E/EQ from the same source. Do I include both^ in the post title? Or just 500 Test and leave the EQ portion out of the title.
-Ended with 114.0 nmol/L test results (in Canada) which converts to 3287.988 ng/dL. Do I: round that up to 3288 ng/dL? Leave at 3287 and omit the .988? Or do I leave as is and include the .988?
-Unsure whether to: add Test 500 + EQ 250 = 750 and use that number for the dose portion of my multiplier calculation? Or just use the 500 test only for the multiplier? So basically:
3287.988 (or whatever the answer to question 2 is) / 750 = x4.3839 multiplier
OR
3287.988 / 500 = x6.5759 multiplier
What I’ve come up with is:
“Source Name - 500/250 Test E/EQ - 3287.988 ng/dL (114.0 nmol/L) x Multiplier”
Obviously this^ is up to correction.
Ps I’ve included the 114.0 nmol/L portion in the title as I’m in Canada and it’s a Canadian domestic source and that’s the unit of measurement that my results were in. Had to convert to ng/dL after the fact.
Thanks,
Cdiggs
About to post bloods for the first time but I’m a little confused with the format and I’m hoping to not fuck it up. Just got a couple questions.
-Ran 500/250 Test E/EQ from the same source. Do I include both^ in the post title? Or just 500 Test and leave the EQ portion out of the title.
-Ended with 114.0 nmol/L test results (in Canada) which converts to 3287.988 ng/dL. Do I: round that up to 3288 ng/dL? Leave at 3287 and omit the .988? Or do I leave as is and include the .988?
-Unsure whether to: add Test 500 + EQ 250 = 750 and use that number for the dose portion of my multiplier calculation? Or just use the 500 test only for the multiplier? So basically:
3287.988 (or whatever the answer to question 2 is) / 750 = x4.3839 multiplier
OR
3287.988 / 500 = x6.5759 multiplier
What I’ve come up with is:
“Source Name - 500/250 Test E/EQ - 3287.988 ng/dL (114.0 nmol/L) x Multiplier”
Obviously this^ is up to correction.
Ps I’ve included the 114.0 nmol/L portion in the title as I’m in Canada and it’s a Canadian domestic source and that’s the unit of measurement that my results were in. Had to convert to ng/dL after the fact.
Thanks,
Cdiggs