What's new
Steroid Source Talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts.

Source Claims *FUCKING READ THIS*

Bluesec

Active member
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Messages
171
Reaction score
31
Over the past 2 months the mod team has seen a rise in users making threads with titles that very clearly call a source out in a negative fashion and then proceed to tell some bro-science story with zero evidence, zero lab results, zero information to be peer-reviewed. In almost every case it’s “I didn’t feel it, bro”.

This shit ends now.

If any user is found posting negative feedback/making negative threads about sources and the first post does not include test results, bloods, labwork, etc for EVERYONE to see then you will lose your ability to post starting at 14 days and going from there.

I want to stress this has nothing to do with covering up and everything to do with accountability. We require sources to update us and go through a verification process so logic would dictate that users would need to prove any claims, positive or negative, to be taken seriously.

So that it’s 100% clear if you make a thread or a post that implies, insinuates, or guides a reader into thinking about a sources product(s) in a negative light WITHOUT legitimate evidence you’re gonna take a break. Lets all put our big-boy pants on and act like adults. We want to help the community grow and posts like these simply cause drama and concern that is usually based on user error/ignorance.
 
Last edited:
Top