Steroid Cycles from Anabolics by William Llewellyn

[dudebro73]

For those interested here is his steroid cycle theory and examples. The article signature is attributed to him. Matches what he wrote in my copy of Anabolics 10th edition e-book.

https://anabolic.org/steroid-cycles/

Interested in feedback of the community’s take by those who have tried any of them.

 

[Animutiddies]

Pretty basic approach to low doses with longevity in mind. This is the approach that anyone outside of actual elite level competition should be taking but we know most seldom do.

 

[Skywalker1230]

If your using legit pharmaceutical grade anabolics then you will make nice gains from his recommended cycles. With UGL products you need higher doses.

 

[uwotm8]

Skywalker1230" pid='69342' dateline='1569163064:

If your using legit pharmaceutical grade anabolics then you will make nice gains from his recommended cycles. With UGL products you need higher doses.

That’s assuming any and all ugl gear has lower purity than the hplc tests that are posted, or it’s assuming that all ugl gear is under dosed. I’m sure your blanket statement can be applied to a number of ugl’s, but it certainly isn’t a fact.

 

[Dexter]

Very little AAS is even available as pharma produced. UGL China produce purity will leave questions unless it’s tested by reputable labs.

If it’s a cheap raw like test, then UGL will often put extra in batch.

Other raws can cost 5 to 20 times more and so I suspect some sellers could underdose or add cheaper stuff like test.

If someone has conservative cycle doses with little side effects, and pays extremely close attention to their diet and workouts(preventing overtraining) then you don’t need this high dose bullshit people believe you need.

I own Llewellyn 11th edition, great book, but I wish he would add articles to the end of each steroid of people that have used it and can report the sides and benefits from first hand experience, the write ups in Anabolics is often too clinical.

 

[Trenstorm]

Skywalker1230" pid='69342' dateline='1569163064:

If your using legit pharmaceutical grade anabolics then you will make nice gains from his recommended cycles. With UGL products you need higher doses.

I’ve used pharma grade test for cycles and notice zero difference between it and ugl when it comes to results. I’m curious if anyone else has actually noticed a legitimate difference between them.

 

[timmyxxx187]

Dexter" pid='69356' dateline='1569173488:

Very little AAS is even available as pharma produced. UGL China produce purity will leave questions unless it’s tested by reputable labs.

If it’s a cheap raw like test, then UGL will often put extra in batch.

Other raws can cost 5 to 20 times more and so I suspect some sellers could underdose or add cheaper stuff like test.

If someone has conservative cycle doses with little side effects, and pays extremely close attention to their diet and workouts(preventing overtraining) then you don’t need this high dose bullshit people believe you need.

I own Llewellyn 11th edition, great book, but I wish he would add articles to the end of each steroid of people that have used it and can report the sides and benefits from first hand experience, the write ups in Anabolics is often too clinical.

Yea Id like to hear experiences. A lot of no test these cycles… I see cycles like that a lot but here and a lot of forums the consensus is “always have atleast trt test in cycle” which I tend to agree with

 

[Niceguy19]

Skywalker1230" pid='69342' dateline='1569163064:

If your using legit pharmaceutical grade anabolics then you will make nice gains from his recommended cycles. With UGL products you need higher doses.

Assuming that they are under not overdosed.