@Forthewin1123
I didn’t even see these prior to today, thank you for posting them! There is always a margin of error for testing that is dependent on the methodology and the machine. These two results show that each sample is nearly identical in the amount that they are off of their stated concentration. That is fairly conclusive, in my mind, that our testing varies that much. I was testing mine independent of Jano, and even consulted with him while setting it up, and dialed in the concentration perfectly. If Jano’s testing results are what we want to go off of, then I’m happy to accommodate that. I have no interest in shorting anyone of anything. I’m not that guy that cuts corners and tries to save a penny so that I can lose thousands, that never made any sense to me. I continually strive for perfection, I can’t have people unhappy with my products, whether real or abstract. In fact, I need to speak to you because it would appear I owe you 180 in bitcoin because I have a standing offer in my intro that says I will pay for Jano testing as long as it’s a blind test (I didn’t know about it prior to sending it off). So very few people have taken me up on that offer, and I’m surprised. So thank you for taking the time and money to do that, hit me up, and I’ll pay you for it. Thank you again for doing this, it is helpful. I’ll get some more products sent off to him so that I can adjust the concentration and his results match the label because that is what testing is available to the public. I should taken that into consideration originally.
Thank you again,
Syn
Edit: I apologize, I thought you were the OP.
