AIPCTSHOP requires signature for delivery

[Saucey]

AIPCTSHOP requires signature for delivery. First order from this source, and find out once USPS attempts delivery. Makes zero sense to do this. Ordered internationally before, from different source, and never had this problem.

I’m extremely disappointed with them, and will /never/ order from them again. Complete bullshit. Take this as a warning to anyone thinking about ordering from them, I advise against it.

 

[Truckertrash13]

@Saucey I ran into the same thing. On their site you can choose to waive signature for delivery and one was still required when it showed up. My lady was home and she signed for it. Now that expresspct is back, I’ll order from them

 

[Saucey]

@Truckertrash13 Was thinking the same thing. Expresspct didn’t do this crap. Assume everything went normal, nothing bad happened?

 

[Truckertrash13]

@Saucey all was good…Didn’t have anything really terrible in the pack…Just some HCG and dick pills…They want to come get me for that, have at it…lol

 

[Saucey]

@Truckertrash13 Good to hear. Used different name, so, worried that it’ll trigger some response from LEO or something.

 

[bdubnumber5]

I don’t understand why a signature is a big deal. I ordered from AIPCT and didn’t have to sign I put waive signature. However if if needed what’s the big deal?

 

[BeatenCheeks]

I asked them about this and I was told that its only a request on their side and that it’s not a guarantee, and that it’s up to each individual postal carrier to honor the request or not and that they sometimes might not see the request.

 

[JDLift]

@bdubnumber5 When you sign for a package it’s assumed by some to make the recipient somehow more guilty of possession than if they didn’t sign for it. People used to believe that a drug package requiring a signature was a sure-fire sign you’re moments from a raid, too. Things are a bit different now, and a lot of people have come to realize that if the police want to raid you they’re not gonna wait for your signature to do it.

 

[TestDecaMast]

JDLift said:

@bdubnumber5 When you sign for a package it’s assumed by some to make the recipient somehow more guilty of possession than if they didn’t sign for it. People used to believe that a drug package requiring a signature was a sure-fire sign you’re moments from a raid, too. Things are a bit different now, and a lot of people have come to realize that if the police want to raid you they’re not gonna wait for your signature to do it.

Him using a fake name for delivery looks waaay more suspicious than just using his own name and signing. That mailman knows exactly the names of everyone that lives there. And when a random international package comes with an unusual name of course mailman is gonna know somethings up. Kids these days.

 

[bdubnumber5]

@JDLift I mean like you said. If the cops are trying to nab you, they don’t need your signature. I truly wouldn’t worry about it if your ordering stuff like hcg, viagra, cialis, accutane, arimidex, Nolva, Chlomid, caber or anything like that. I think the bigger concern is narcotics. I think if they even opened a box of dick pills chances are they would close the box and push it through with no issues.