Bloodwork is subjective. It is appreciated but must be contextualized. Without the context of all the drugs you were running, all their doses, how long you'd been on each, and comparisons to previous bloodwork on different cycles with a pharmaceutical grade (or otherwise labtested Aromasin product) there is nothing to interpret from them.
You simply cannot attest to the efficacy of an aromasin tablet based on it not lowering your E2 levels on your bloodwork to your desired number. There are any number of reasons that your E2 might appear higher than you'd like, for example 1) low response to aromasin, 2) changes of dosages leading up to second bloodwork, 3) use of drugs that skew estradiol figures (trenbolone, for example). The list goes on. Bloodwork is appreciated but is rarely sufficient to serve as undeniable proof of the accurate dosing of a product.
You're not expected to send $250 to Janoshik, but you are expected to present evidence to claims of items being bunk, underdosed, mislabeled, etc.. You are always welcome to give anecdotal reviews and make it clear that they are such. For example your experience could be rephrased as "I was not happy with Syn's aromasin, I was on week 4 of cycle X and got bloodwork. After discovering my E2 was high, I introduced Syn's aromasin at Y dose Z times per week. When I pursued more bloodwork to check on how it was working for me, my E2 was lowered but not as much as I had expected." Perfectly acceptable anecdotal review of your experience.
Unfortunately you're resolving to superlative and accusations far beyond those which a reasonable person would make in these circumstances. I note, too, your posts on other forums about this vendor. I believe you use a different username on MesoRX where you've also launched some fairly aggressive accusations in the absence of empirical evidence.
