They very well could. Hence why most offer a credit for having you, the user, send in their product yourself.Is source lab work credible? Cant, they test good products and sell underdosed? I'm, sure there are good people on the board I really want to give the benefit of the doubt.
Take the time and put this scenario to paper. Savings per x00 units from underdosing by a percentage not immediately noticeable by customers, risk of customers not returning due to being underwhelmed by bloodwork or otherwise etc. and you'll likely find this idea worth less than properly dosing products. Batch obfuscation is more common and easier to slip by, which means reusing that initial good test result and its batch number for what are actually subsequent batches. They may not be intentionally but accidentally underdosed and now the source has the intial lab report and positive reviews about the 'same' batch to fall back on for defense in case of complaints, which buys enough time fix appearances. You needn't worry what else a source may have up their sleeve fortunately because blind testing. as suggested by @CaptainAmerica, exposes the vast majority of tricks if seen through properly, and any decent source will reimburse you in full for it to boot. There's not enough blindtesting seeing the light of day so genuinely consider it if you can.Is source lab work credible? Cant, they test good products and sell underdosed? I'm, sure there are good people on the board I really want to give the benefit of the doubt.
Recently posted a roidtest+blind hplc testing on a lab I thought had the best customer service and turn around time. Now at least I know the gear I use is legitIs source lab work credible? Cant, they test good products and sell underdosed? I'm, sure there are good people on the board I really want to give the benefit of the doubt.