Arms_Length" pid='12047' dateline='1525736687:
Yeah that’s why I’m not sure what to think, I wish they’d just post more and explain to be honest. Even if it’s just this instance, it’s weird and makes me feel meh unfortunately. Like I’m definitely happy with the results I’ve gotten and I’d have a hard time telling myself those are faked, but even if they aren’t you have this.Deadlift" pid='12041' dateline='1525735938:
I think they are able to test substances but with my case in particular EC has already admitted to falsifying the data. Did you look at the links I posted? They are exact copies with minor photoshopping. Trust me man, I don’t turn on people quickly but this is solid evidence, especially them legit saying they do not deny falsifying the data. I stood up for these guys in the beginning and hoped they would do well here. But faking results should not be acceptable from anyone.Arms_Length" pid='12035' dateline='1525735419:
I’m not sure it’s a scam, I really can’t get past the fact I’ve sent multiple blind tests to them and they’ve reported back accurate results. I’m definitely confused, but that’s one thing I can’t get past. Either way it comes off unprofessional which is disappointing.I can confirm that @“EnergyControl” provided me these graphs here: which are the black copies that Jano speaks of. If you look in the article here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0056168 you will see that the graphs are stolen right out of there. These guys falsified results that I paid money for. I take that shit seriously and you all should too. Do not send these guys your money. In all honesty, I don’t care if you refund me EC, paying $75 to help expose a scamming peice of shit with no morals like yourself is money well spent in my opinion.
Thank you Jano.
Last edited: